MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1991668733 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-1198

Abstract 1198: Connexin 43 is an estrogen receptor β1 regulated gene in breast cancer

2011· article· en· W1991668733 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ketan Badiani, Elizabeth McLachlan, Kanyarat Ung, Charles Ung, Leigh C. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrogen receptorConnexinCancer researchCancer cellCell cultureBiologyTamoxifenCell biologyBreast cancerCancerGap junctionIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Connexins are a family of transmembrane proteins that allow direct cell to cell communication. Normal human mammary epithelium expresses both connexin 43 (Cx43) and connexin 26 (Cx26) and when overexpressed, these connexins have been shown to act as tumor suppressors in human breast cancer. We have previously characterized two human breast cancer cells lines that inducibly overexpress estrogen receptor β1 (ERβ1) and we utilize these cells to examine the regulation of Cx43 by ERβ1 in human breast cancer. We observe that in both MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells that inducibly overexpress ERβ1, upon estradiol (E2) stimulation, there is a 4-fold or greater increase in Cx43 protein, regardless of whether cells are grown in two-dimensional (2D) or organotypic three-dimensional (3D) cell culture. Cx43 mRNA increases 2-fold upon ERβ1 induction and E2 stimulation of MDA-MB-231 cells with no co-incident change in Cx26 mRNA. Cx43 protein significantly increases upon treatment of cells with selective ERβ agonists, like DPN or genistein, but not with the ERα agonist PPT. Treatment of cells with ICI 182780 inhibits the E2 stimulated increase in Cx43 protein, while, the E2 stimulated increase was still seen in the presence of the anti-progestin RU486. Moreover, we observe a morphological shift in the appearance of MDA-MB-231 cells that overexpress ERβ1 when grown in 3D culture to that of a more differentiated-like organoid. Further work will involve an analysis of the interaction between ERβ1 and the Cx43 promoter. Taken together, the data suggests that Cx43 is an ERβ1 regulated gene. This research is funded by grants from CBCRA (Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance), CIHR (Canadian Institutes for Health Research), and CCMF (CancerCare Manitoba Foundation). EM is the recipient of a post-doctoral research fellowship from the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute – Terry Fox Foundation. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1198. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1198

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicConnexins and lens biology→French-language works237,207→