Novel bisindolylmaleimide derivative inhibits mitochondrial permeability transition pore and protects the heart from reperfusion injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite major advances in treating patients with coronary heart disease, reperfusion injury is still considered to be a major problem, especially in surgical settings. Here, we demonstrate the protective effects of a novel bisindolylmaleimide derivative, MS1 (2-[1-(3-aminopropyl)indol-3-yl]-3-(indol-3-yl)-N-methylmaleimide), against reperfusion injury of the heart. After anesthesia and artificial ventilation, Wistar rats were subjected to 30 min of left coronary artery occlusion followed by 120 min of reperfusion with or without treating the rats with MS1 (2.25 mumol.L-1.kg-1) before left coronary artery occlusion. Compared with the untreated hearts, MS1 treatment significantly reduced myocardial infarct size (35.1% +/- 3% vs. 75.5% +/- 5%, p < 0.001), reduced prevalence of apoptotic cells (2.6% +/- 0.5% vs. 12.2% +/- 2.1%, p < 0.001), prevented mitochondrial swelling and cytochrome c release, inhibited downregulation of antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 expression, and suppressed caspase-3 activation. In contrast, pretreatment with atractyloside, a mitochondrial permeability transition pore opener, abolished the protective effects of MS1. In conclusion, MS1 inhibits pathologic opening of permeability transition pores and protects the heart against reperfusion injury and pathologic apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".