MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ag modified LSCF as cathode material for protonic conducting SOFCs

2012· article· en· W1991719275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCathodeSinteringElectrolyteNon-blocking I/OAnodePerovskite (structure)OxideElectrochemistryChemical engineeringChemical stabilitySolid oxide fuel cellProton conductorComposite materialMetallurgyCatalysisElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BaCe0·7Zr0·1Y0·2O3−δ (BCZY) electrolyte and La0·6Sr0·4Co0·2Fe0·8O3−δ (LSCF) cathode perovskite materials were synthesised using the citrate–nitrate combustion method. NiO–BCZY anode supported thin film sold oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) was fabricated using spin coating and co-sintering process. LSCF exhibited good chemical stability in H2O containing atmosphere and chemical compatibility with BCZY proton conducting material. The electrochemical performance of the Ag–LSCF composite cathode was dependent on the Ag content. The thin film proton conducting SOFC displayed highest maximum power density of 563 mW cm−2 at 700°C for 10 wt-%Ag–(LSCF+BCZY) composite cathode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it