MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991727409 · doi:10.1177/10253823070140020801

Le Réseau québécois des Villes et Villages en santé : un mouvement fort confronté à de nouveaux défis

2007· article· fr· W1991727409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paule Simard

Bibliographic record

VenuePromotion & Education · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au service de ses membres depuis vingt ans, le Réseau québécois des Villes et Villages en santé fait actuellement face à plusieurs défis. L'organisation des territoires locaux de même que les multiples responsabilités qui leurs sont dévolues sont actuellement en mutation. Le RQVVS, par sa capacité à mobiliser les municipalités, est extrêmement bien placé pour diffuser, encourager et appuyer ses membres à non seulement arrimer les différentes démarches gouvernementales, mais pour les inciter à le faire de concert avec d'autres partenaires institutionnels (éducation, santé, socio-économiques, etc.) ou communautaires. Il doit cependant repenser son soutien direct à ses membres tout en poursuivant ses activités de diffusion d'informations et de réseautage. ( Promotion & Education, 2007, (2) : pp 121-122)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePromotion & EducationSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207