MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991774560 · doi:10.1177/0091270010382420

Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Polymorphism Is Age Dependent

2010· article· en· W1991774560 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bettina A. Hamelin, Marcin Zakrzewski‐Jakubiak, Nicolas Robitaille, Peter Bogaty, Line Labbé, Jacques Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionAngiotensin-converting enzymeGenotypeMedicineInternal medicineAlleleYoung adultCoronary artery diseasePolymorphism (computer science)Gene polymorphismLocus (genetics)EndocrinologyGeneticsGeneBiologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene is a candidate genetic locus for coronary artery disease (CAD). Studies investigating the relationship between the ACE-insertion/deletion (I/D) gene polymorphism and myocardial infarction (MI) have been inconsistent. The authors hypothesized that age may be an important modulating factor in this relationship. ACE-I/D allele and genotype distribution was determined in 3 groups: 104 men with a first MI at a young age (≤45 years old), 271 healthy young men (≤30 years old), and 28 healthy elderly men (>65 years old). All participants were French descendants from Quebec City, Canada. Frequency distribution of the ACE alleles and genotypes was similar among the healthy young, the healthy elderly, and the MI patients (P > .05). However, when considering the age at the time of the MI (≤40, ≤35, or ≤30 years old), a significant age-dependent effect with the prevalence of the ACE-DD genotype was found, as it increased by 22%, 61%, and 157%, respectively, compared with the healthy young group (P < .05). Similar observations were obtained versus the healthy elderly men (P < .05). The ACE-I/D polymorphism seems to be a genetic risk factor for MI in young men and becomes an important modulator of MI risk at a young age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207