MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991782946 · doi:10.1080/15538362.2010.492328

Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Associated with Highbush Blueberries (<i>Vaccinium corymbosum</i>) in the Pacific Northwest of North America

2010· article· en· W1991782946 on OpenAlexaffabout
Inga A. Zasada, John N. Pinkerton, T. Forge

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Fruit Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVacciniumXiphinemaBiologyGeographyBotanyNematodeEcologyNematology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) are an important agricultural crop in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S. and coastal British Columbia of Canada. Three separate surveys were conducted to elucidate the occurrence and distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia. Plant-parasitic nematodes were detected in 73% of the surveyed blueberry fields. The two most commonly encountered plant-parasitic nematodes in all geographical locations surveyed were Paratrichodorus spp. and Pratylenchus spp. Xiphinema americanum was also detected during the surveys, but was geographically limited to southern Washington and the Willamette Valley of western Oregon. Five other plant-parasitic nematode genera/families were detected during the surveys, but never at high frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Fruit ScienceSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207