Psychological Needs as Mediators? The Relationship Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Well Being in People Diagnosed With Osteoporosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsDiane E. Mack The first three authors were supported by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada during the preparation of this manuscript. We thank the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Brock University Advancement Fund for providing funding for this research project. We are also grateful to the participants who willingly gave their time, Osteoporosis Canada–Niagara Chapter, The British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre Osteofit Program, YWCA, The National Osteoporosis Society, The International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis for their support of this research. Please address correspondence concerning this article to Diane E. Mack, Department of Kinesiology, Behavioral Health Sciences Lab, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Ave, St. Catharines ON, Canada L2S 3A1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".