Quelques recherches récentes en sciences de la nature et leurs incidences théologiques sur la question de l’hominisation1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’orientation actuelle des recherches en paléo-anthropologie ainsi qu’en étude de la cognition animale comporte des implications importantes pour l’anthropologie théologique, plus particulièrement à propos de l’émergence de l’humanité au sein du monde animal. Après avoir résumé l’état de la question à propos de l’hominisation en théologie et les contributions en théologie systématique contemporaine concernant la place de l’être humain dans la nature, puis formulé certaines précisions méthodologiques, l’article présente des recherches récentes (1996-2001) en biologie et en paléo-anthropologie. Ces recherches questionnent l’extension et l’usage du concept d’hominisation, à propos duquel des propositions sont formulées ici à l’usage de la théologie. Enfin, des enjeux théologiques cruciaux se dégagent de l’étude et sont présentés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".