Quelques recherches récentes en sciences de la nature et leurs incidences théologiques sur la question de l’hominisation1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’orientation actuelle des recherches en paléo-anthropologie ainsi qu’en étude de la cognition animale comporte des implications importantes pour l’anthropologie théologique, plus particulièrement à propos de l’émergence de l’humanité au sein du monde animal. Après avoir résumé l’état de la question à propos de l’hominisation en théologie et les contributions en théologie systématique contemporaine concernant la place de l’être humain dans la nature, puis formulé certaines précisions méthodologiques, l’article présente des recherches récentes (1996-2001) en biologie et en paléo-anthropologie. Ces recherches questionnent l’extension et l’usage du concept d’hominisation, à propos duquel des propositions sont formulées ici à l’usage de la théologie. Enfin, des enjeux théologiques cruciaux se dégagent de l’étude et sont présentés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.038 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".