MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991796013 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2014.2329276

A Distributed Reflector Localization Approach to Ultrasonic Array Imaging in Non-Destructive Testing Applications

2014· article· en· W1991796013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNondestructive testingUltrasonic testingUltrasonic sensorAcousticsReflector (photography)Sample (material)Acoustic emissionPoint (geometry)Computer scienceOpticsMathematicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In array-based immersion ultrasonic non-destructive testing (NDT), an ultrasonic array and a solid test sample are immersed in water for the purpose of imaging and flaw detection inside the test sample. In such a test scenario, the upper surface of the test sample has two effects: i) it produces a strong interference signal in the backscattered received signal, and ii) its shape determines the array spatial signature of every point inside the material under test. Hence, in immersion NDT, to achieve a precise localization of a crack inside a test sample, the knowledge of the shape of the upper surface of the test sample is required. In this paper, we propose a distributed reflector modeling approach to characterize the interface between water and a solid test sample as well as any crack inside the solid test sample. This approach relies on the so-called incoherently distributed reflector modeling, where a distributed reflector can be modeled as infinitely many point sources located close to each other. Using such an approach, we present a model for the array data, and then develop a covariance fitting based technique to estimate the parameters of the shape of the interface between the two media and those of the shape of a crack inside the test material. Our numerical experiments show that our proposed approach yields a lower root mean squared error for the parameter estimates, compared to a state-of-the-art method, called root mean squared velocity technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it