MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991798408 · doi:10.1159/000111421

Localization of mRNA for UDP-Galactose: Ceramide Galactosyltransferase in the Brain during Mouse Development

2007· article· en· W1991798408 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tetsushi Kagawa, Akio Oba, S Okumura, Kazuhiro Ikenaka

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Physiological SciencesInstitut national de la recherche scientifique
KeywordsGalactosyltransferaseBiologyIn situ hybridizationOligodendrocyteMedulla oblongataCell biologyMessenger RNAGalactocerebrosideMolecular biologyNeuroscienceCentral nervous systemGeneEnzymeMyelinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UDP-galactose:ceramide galactosyltransferase (CGT) is considered to be a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of galactocerebroside (GalC), a frequently used marker for oligodendrocytes. CGT gene expression has been shown to be restricted to the oligodendrocyte lineage in young adult rat brain. We detected expression of the CGT gene in embryonic mouse brain and spinal cord from E17 onward using an in situ hybridization technique. Localization of CGT messages was restricted to two longitudinal columns of cells in the basal half of the ventricular zone around the fourth ventricule at the most caudal level of the medulla oblongata. After birth, they were distributed in caudal-to-rostral and ventral-to-dorsal gradients. This study shows that CGT mRNA is a good marker for localizing oligodendrocytes, and appears just before the GalC-positive stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeuroscienceSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207