MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991807328 · doi:10.1002/stc.337

Robust direct adaptive controller for the nonlinear highway bridge benchmark

2009· article· en· W1991807328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Control and Health Monitoring · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Benchmark (surveying)Controller (irrigation)Nonlinear systemParameterized complexityAdaptive controlArtificial neural networkSupervisorComputer scienceNonlinear controlEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a direct adaptive control scheme for the active control of the nonlinear highway bridge benchmark. The controller is based on the premise of direct adaptive control, where-in the system response is made to follow a desired trajectory. The principal problem of the unavailability of the correct network output is inferred from the observed structure behavior. The control force in this paper is calculated using a single hidden layer nonlinearly parameterized neural network in conjunction with a proportional-derivative type controller. The neural network is utilized to approximate the nonlinear control law, that is known to exist, and not the system nonlinearities. Stable tuning laws for the free parameters of the nonlinearly parameterized network are derived based on Lyapunov theory. Set in the framework of adaptive control, the proposed control architecture addresses important issues related to the stability of the closed loop system and parameter bounds. Performance of the proposed control scheme is evaluated on the recently proposed nonlinear highway bridge benchmark, incorporating nonlinear isolation bearings and nonlinear structural elements. Results are presented in terms of a well-defined set of performance indices. The results show that the proposed controller scheme can achieve good response reductions in the structure, without the need for the exact description of the nonlinearities, or extensive structural system information. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it