Markedly elevated levels of estrone sulfate after long-term oral, but not transdermal, administration of estradiol in postmenopausal women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare serum estrone sulfate (E1S) levels in postmenopausal women during long-term treatment with commonly prescribed doses of oral and transdermal estradiol (E2). DESIGN: A retrospective study performed in a University setting in the United States involving 33 healthy postmenopausal women. Two groups of postmenopausal women were studied: group 1 (n = 10) received 1 mg oral micronized E2 daily for 16 months; blood was drawn at 0, 7, and 15 months. Group 2 (n = 23) was randomized into three subgroups. Two of the subgroups (n = 8; n = 7) received E2 delivered at a rate of 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day, respectively, by transdermal patch, changed twice weekly; the third subgroup received a placebo (without E2) patch for 9 continuous months. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 6, and 9 months. Serum E1S and E2 were quantified by specific radioimmunoassays. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance. RESULTS: After oral E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly (p < 0.01) from baseline, reaching an average level of 38.8 ng/mL at 15 months. After transdermal E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly, yet to a much lesser extent, reaching levels of 1.8 ng/mL and 3.2 ng/mL after 9 months of treatment with the 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day patches, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Markedly elevated levels of E1S were found after long-term oral estrogen treatment. In comparison to the increase in E1S levels after long-term oral estrogen treatment, there was only a small increase in E1S levels after transdermal E2 therapy. This difference may be attributed to the higher dosage of oral E2 that is required because of the low bioavailability compared with the transdermal dosages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".