MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991849760 · doi:10.1021/ja805074d

Sequence-Scrambling Fragmentation Pathways of Protonated Peptides

2008· article· en· W1991849760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
KeywordsChemistryProtonationFragmentation (computing)IonDissociation (chemistry)ScramblingCollision-induced dissociationComputational chemistryTransition stateDensity functional theoryStereochemistryCrystallographyMass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gas-phase structures and fragmentation pathways of the N-terminal b and a fragments of YAGFL-NH(2), AGLFY-NH(2), GFLYA-NH(2), FLYAG-NH(2), and LYAGF-NH(2) were investigated using collision-induced dissociation (CID) and detailed molecular mechanics and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Our combined experimental and theoretical approach allows probing of the scrambling and rearrangement reactions that take place in CID of b and a ions. It is shown that low-energy CID of the b(5) fragments of the above peptides produces nearly the same dissociation patterns. Furthermore, CID of protonated cyclo-(YAGFL) generates the same fragments with nearly identical ion abundances when similar experimental conditions are applied. This suggests that rapid cyclization of the primarily linear b(5) ions takes place and that the CID spectrum is indeed determined by the fragmentation behavior of the cyclic isomer. This can open up at various amide bonds, and its fragmentation behavior can be understood only by assuming a multitude of fragmenting linear structures. Our computational results fully support this cyclization-reopening mechanism by showing that protonated cyclo-(YAGFL) is energetically favored over the linear b(5) isomers. Furthermore, the cyclization-reopening transition structures are energetically less demanding than those of conventional bond-breaking reactions, allowing fast interconversion among the cyclic and linear isomers. This chemistry can lead in principle to complete loss of sequence information upon CID, as documented for the b(5) ion of FLYAG-NH(2). CID of the a(5) ions of the above peptides produces fragment ion distributions that can be explained by assuming b-type scrambling of their parent population and a --> a*-type rearrangement pathways ( Vachet , R. W. , Bishop , B. M. , Erickson , B. W. , and Glish , G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5481 ). While a ions easily undergo cyclization, the resulting macrocycle predominantly reopens to regenerate the original linear structure. Computational data indicate that the a --> a*-type rearrangement pathways of the linear a isomers involve post-cleavage proton-bound dimer intermediates in which the fragments reassociate and the originally C-terminal fragment is transferred to the N-terminus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it