MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991851678 · doi:10.1002/nha3.10211

Community‐Based Adult Literacy Programs: Translating Postmodern Theory into Administrative Practce

2005· article· en· W1991851678 on OpenAlexaff
Marion Terry

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostmodernismLiteracyAutonomyEmpowermentPedagogySociologyPower (physics)Public relationsPsychologyPolitical scienceEpistemologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Postmodernism permeates the community‐based adult literacy program model. The administrative roles of community advisory groups and literacy program coordinators are critical in ensuring that their programs stay true to their postmodern origins. This means ensuring that they do not lose their grass roots commitment to small classroom groups characterized by shared power and professional autonomy, collegial collaboration among instructors, learner‐centered and experience‐based instruction, and student empowerment, de‐marginalization and de‐differentiation. This article focuses on the postmodern responsibilities assumed by those who are most directly involved with each adult literacy program and its students: the advisory group members and the program coordinator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource DevelopmentSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207