MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Creep resistance in magnesium alloys

2010· article· en· W1991866446 on OpenAlexaff
Mihriban Pekguleryuz, Mert Çelikin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Materials Reviews · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepIntermetallicMaterials scienceMetallurgyAlloyMicrostructureGrain boundaryMagnesium alloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mg creep resistant alloys have seen increased interest in the 1980s and 90s due to the weight reduction objectives of automotive companies. Development of Mg-Al based alloys with rare earth (RE) and alkaline earth element additions has led to the automotive application of Mg-6Al-2Sr (AJ62) alloy in the BMW engine block and the Mg-4Al-4RE (AE44) alloy in the engine cradle of the Corvette in 2002-2004. Most creep resistant Mg alloy development activities during this period emphasised the creation of stable grain boundary intermetallic phases in the cast microstructure. This elevated the creep performance of automotive Mg alloys to higher temperature and stress combinations (175°C, 70 MPa). Further improvement in creep performance can only arise from an in depth understanding of the creep mechanisms and the related microstructural interactions in Mg alloy systems. This paper gives an in depth review of creep mechanisms in Mg alloys and provides insight into alloy design principles for further development of creep performance in Mg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations271
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Materials ReviewsSame topicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207