MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991889063 · doi:10.7202/015396ar

La production d'un sujet-femme adapté au développement. Le cas de la recherche féministe aux Philippines

2003· article· fr· W1991889063 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Colette St-Hilaire

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La production d'un sujet-femme adapté au développement. Le cas de la recherche féministe aux Philippines Depuis les années 1970, on assiste aux Philippines à une véritable prolifération des discours sur les femmes et le développement. En même temps, les rouages administratifs de l'intégration des femmes au développement apparaissent : Commission des femmes, Plan de développement pour les femmes, autant de canaux par lesquels les luttes des femmes s'inscrivent dans une dynamique de gestion. En s'appuyant sur l'étude de deux projets financés par le Canada, cet article analyse un effet imprévisible de la production de discours sur l'intégration des femmes au développement : la constitution d'un domaine de savoir/pouvoir et, en corollaire, l'apparition d'une nouvelle tendance, celle de la gestion sociale des femmes dans le dispositif du développement. Mots clés : St-Hilaire, féminisme, femmes et développement, savoir/pouvoir, Foucault, Philippines

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.573
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.041 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207