MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fall During a Wheelchair Transfer

2001· article· en· W1991904327 on OpenAlexaff
R. Lee Kirby, Cher Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWheelchairBrakeMedicineLock (firearm)Physical medicine and rehabilitationAmputationPhysical therapyAutomotive engineeringSurgeryComputer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kirby RL, Smith C: Fall during a wheelchair transfer: a case of mismatched brakes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:302–304. We report the case of a patient who had a transtibial amputation and whose wheelchair had been inadvertently fitted with a push-to-lock brake on one side and a pull-to-lock brake on the other. During a standing-pivot transfer from bed to wheelchair, during which the patient thought that she had applied both brakes, the wheelchair turned away from the patient toward the side of the unlocked brake and the patient fell to the floor. This case report has implications for wheelchair design, wheelchair system management, and for user training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationSame topicAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityFrench-language works237,207