MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991935021 · doi:10.1080/14631371003740738

The effectiveness of government-sponsored programmes in supporting the SME sector in Poland

2010· article· en· W1991935021 on OpenAlex
Darek Klonowski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePost-Communist Economies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInnovation Policy and R&D
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersEuropean Social Fund
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)BusinessMarket liquidityEconomic growthPublic sectorSmall and medium-sized enterprisesFinanceEconomicsEconomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the government assistance programmes to small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) in Poland and to assess the effectiveness of these programmes in stimulating development of the SME sector. There are three main conclusions from the study. First, the Polish government support programmes are poorly structured, fragmented and untargeted. Second, the programmes do not meet the actual needs of the sector and, hence, are poorly used. Third, there is strong evidence to confirm the existence of liquidity gaps in financing the SME sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it