Analytical Modeling of a Bolted Flange Joint Subjected to Creep Relaxation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bolted flanged gasketed joints are the weak link between pressure vessel equipments including nuclear reactors. Their leakage tightness behavior is compromised due to the effect of creep of the gasket, the bolts and the flange, which relaxes the bolt load and causes a subsequent loss of the gasket contact stress. This is especially true when the joint is operating under high pressure and high temperature conditions. Apart from an acknowledgement of this affect, the ASME code does not give specific guidelines to help the design engineer in assessing this effect. The objective of this paper is to present an analytical method capable of predicting the bolt load relaxation in a gasketed joint as a result of creep of either the gasket, the bolt and the flange separately or all together. The proposed method is validated by comparison with 3D FE models of different size flanges and experimental data. A strong emphasis will be put on flange rigidity, which is the major controlling parameter of the load relaxation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it