MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1991970820 · doi:10.1139/o01-077

Contribution of leucine 85 to the structure and function of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> iso-1 cytochrome <i>c</i>

2001· article· en· W1991970820 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Jonathan C. Parrish, J. Guy Guillemette, Carmichael J. A. Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCytochrome C1Cytochrome c oxidaseCoenzyme Q – cytochrome c reductaseElectron transport chainCytochrome cHemeCytochromeChemistryBiochemistryElectron transferHemeproteinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCytochrome P450 reductaseStereochemistryYeastEnzymeMitochondrionPhotochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytochrome c is a small electron-transport protein whose major role is to transfer electrons between complex III (cytochrome reductase) and complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) in the inner mitochondrial membrane of eukaryotes. Cytochrome c is used as a model for the examination of protein folding and structure and for the study of biological electron-transport processes. Amongst 96 cytochrome c sequences, residue 85 is generally conserved as either isoleucine or leucine. Spatially, the side chain is associated closely with that of the invariant residue Phe82, and this interaction may be important for optimal cytochrome c activity. The functional role of residue 85 has been examined using six site-directed mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iso-1 cytochrome c, including, for the first time, kinetic data for electron transfer with the principle physiological partners. Results indicate two likely roles for the residue: first, heme crevice resistance to ligand exchange, sensitive to both the hydrophobicity and volume of the side chain; second, modulation of electron-transport activity through maintenance of the hydrophobic character of the protein in the vicinity of Phe82 and the exposed heme edge, and possibly of the ability of this region to facilitate redox-linked conformational change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell Biology→Same topicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→