Development of Degradable Fe-35Mn Alloy for Biomedical Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As some biomedical problems require only temporary intervention, there is a clinical need for degradable biomaterials with excellent mechanical properties and controllable degradation behaviour. Although several works were carried out on both polymeric and metallic materials, no proposed degradable biomaterial fully satisfied these requirements. Therefore a new Fe-35Mn alloy has been developed as a valid and well suited alternative. The alloy was fabricated through powder metallurgy route followed by successive cold rolling and sintering cycles. This austenitic alloy exhibits a high strength and ductility, comparable to that of type 316L stainless steel. Its antiferromagnetic behaviour is not changed by cold deformation process. The alloy shows suitable degradation behaviour with a uniform corrosion mechanism and a slow release of ions that make it particularly well suited for the development of a new class of biodegradable stents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it