MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992027167 · doi:10.1139/v07-055

High-resolution gas phase P L-edge photoabsorption spectra of PF<sub>5</sub>

2007· article· en· W1992027167 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Yongfeng Hu, Lucia Zuin, R. Püttner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRydberg formulaChemistryRydberg stateAtomic physicsValence (chemistry)Spectral lineLigand field theoryRydberg atomRydberg matterRydberg constantIonPhysicsIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution photoabsorption spectra of P 2s and 2p levels of PF5 are reported. Fine structure, due to spin-orbit and ligand field splittings together with strong vibrational progression, is resolved in the Rydberg region of the P 2p spectrum. A ligand field splitting of 31 meV for the 2p3/2 orbital is obtained from the fit of the Rydberg transitions. The Franck–Condon fit analysis revealed that the vibrational progression of the higher Rydberg states is different from that of the valence-Rydberg mixed 4s state. In particular, we derived a decrease in P–F bond distances of 12 and 28 pm for the 4s valence-Rydberg mixed state and the high nl Rydberg states, respectively. The natural linewidths of the P 2p levels were determined to be 55 meV.Key words: PF5, Rydberg state, vibrational, ligand field splitting, photoabsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207