MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992034510 · doi:10.1021/ie050101b

Dynamic Modeling of an Industrial Electric Arc Furnace

2005· article· en· W1992034510 on OpenAlexaff
Richard MacRosty, Christopher L.E. Swartz

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric arc furnaceSteelmakingRobustness (evolution)Process engineeringComputer scienceElectric arcProcess (computing)Process modelingProcess optimizationChemistryEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the development of a dynamic model for an industrial steelmaking electric arc furnace (EAF). The model is sufficiently detailed so as to describe the melting process and chemical reactions and account for reagent and energy additions. The lack of knowledge of reaction mechanisms due to the complex nature of the reacting system is overcome by modeling the process as equilibrium zones with mass transport limitations. An important objective of developing this model is to ensure that it can be used within an optimization framework, thus particular consideration is given to the continuity of model equations and the robustness of the model over a wide range of conditions. Parameter estimation is carried out using industrial data and the model performance illustrated through simulation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207