MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992034748 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.045312

Spin-polarized multiexcitons in quantum dots in the presence of spin-orbit interaction

2011· article· en· W1992034748 on OpenAlexaff
Lars Schweidenback, M. Yasar, C. H. Li, Aubrey T. Hanbicki, Marek Korkusiński, Γ. Κιοσέογλου, Berend T. Jonker, A. Petrou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersUniversity at BuffaloCentre International de Recherche sur le CancerNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuantum dotCondensed matter physicsElectronSpin (aerodynamics)Spin polarizationExcitonPhysicsCircular polarizationSpin–orbit interactionMagnetic fieldOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient electron spin-relaxation mechanism has been observed in InAs quantum dots (QDs) that manifests itself as a sharp drop in the circular polarization of the light emitted by Fe spin-light emitting diodes, which incorporate a single layer of InGaAs QDs, for a narrow range of magnetic fields around 5 T. The underlying mechanism occurs when the QDs are occupied by three-electron-hole pairs forming a tri-exciton (3X) and is a two-step process. The first step involves the spin flip of one of the three electrons mediated by the spin-orbit interaction; in the second step the 3X relaxes to its ground state via phonon emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207