MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992051902 · doi:10.1021/ef0497659

Asphaltene Monolayers at a Toluene/Water Interface

2005· article· en· W1992051902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneTolueneMonolayerChemical engineeringFourier transform infrared spectroscopyChemistryPhase (matter)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphaltene films at a toluene/water interface were characterized using a Langmuir interfacial trough. An asphaltene monolayer was determined to remain at the toluene/water interface, and asphaltenes do not migrate from the monolayer to the bulk toluene or water phase. When the hydrocarbon phase is removed and replaced with a fresh toluene phase (dilution experiment), the pressure−area isotherm obtained was almost identical to that from the original asphaltene monolayer at the interface. Addition of 2-propanol into the oil phase (toluene) caused the interfacial asphaltene monolayer to become more flexible. However, 2-propanol molecules did not displace asphaltene molecules. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the transferred Langmuir−Blodgett (LB) asphaltene films from toluene−water and a mixture of toluene and 2-propanol/water interface show similar aggregated structures. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the deposited LB asphaltene films show the presence of bonded water in asphaltene films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it