MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992056465 · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032517

Calculation of supercritical Dirac resonance parameters for heavy-ion systems from a coupled-differential-equation approach

2011· article· en· W1992056465 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Marsman, Marko Horbatsch

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultipole expansionPhysicsDirac (video compression format)Partial differential equationDirac equationResonance (particle physics)Supercritical fluidConvergence (economics)SpinorAnalytic continuationQuantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous work [E. Ackad and M. Horbatsch, Phys. Rev. A 78, 062711 (2008)] on supercritical Dirac resonance parameters from extrapolated analytic continuation, obtained with a Fourier grid method, is generalized by numerically solving the coupled Dirac radial equations to a high precision. The equations, which contain the multipole decomposition of the two-center potential, are augmented by a complex absorbing potential and truncated at various orders in the partial wave expansion to demonstrate convergence of the resonance parameters in the limit of vanishing absorber. The convergence of the partial-wave spinor and of the multipole potential expansions is demonstrated in the supercritical regime. The comparison of critical distances with literature values shows that the work provides benchmark results for future two-center calculations without multipole expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207