MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992060959 · doi:10.7202/009448ar

Le comparatisme d’André Siegfried

2004· article· fr· W1992060959 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gérard Fabre

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory, Culture, and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les ouvrages d’André Siegfried sur le Canada parus en 1906 et 1937 montrent l’intérêt d’une approche comparatiste soucieuse des relations entre les sociétés. Trois domaines sont abordés : l’éducation, la politique intérieure et certaines dimensions des relations internationales. Malgré quelques erreurs sur le devenir du Canada, dues pour la plupart à son eurocentrisme, Siegfried administre une leçon encore bien vivante de comparatisme, qu’il s’agisse de confronter les types d’enseignement catholique, protestant et laïque, de pointer les carences du bipartisme ou de brosser sans complaisance l’évolution historique des liens entre la France et les deux Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicHistory, Culture, and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207