Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un enseignement qui n’aurait d’autre but que de faire assimiler des contenus systématisés dans un programme ne permettrait pas à l’étudiant d’exercer son pouvoir créateur dans l’acte de connaître. C’est pour remédier à cette carence de l’enseignement de type magistral que l’on a préconisé des méthodes basées sur la conception d’un apprentissage non plus structuré de l’extérieur en référence à la logique interne de la matière, mais guidé par l’expérience de l’apprenant. Mais on réalise aujourd’hui que le fait d’ériger l’expérience de l’apprenant en guide incontesté de l’apprentissage comporte aussi des risques majeurs. C’est dans le but de dépasser cette antinomie entre enseignement magistral et autoapprentissage que le présent article propose une démarche basée sur la relation dialectique qui s’établit, en tout processus d’apprentissage, entre deux ordres de savoir : le savoir d’expérience de l’apprenant et le savoir théorique véhiculé dans les programmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".