MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992091460 · doi:10.7202/044363ar

Conclusion et perspectives

2010· article· fr· W1992091460 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean-Pierre Lemasson, Amy B. Trubek

Bibliographic record

VenueCuizine The Journal of Canadian Food Cultures · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerroirHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La conclusion examine, en faisant la synthèse des divers articles de cette publication, les conditions spécifiques de production et de commercialisation des fromages, des raisins et du vin et du sirop d’érable tout particulièrement au Vermont et au Québec. Chaque catégorie de produits soulève des enjeux différenciés quant aux notions de localité, terroirs et circuits de commercialisation. Toutefois l’obstacle majeur réside surtout dans une véritable incompréhension de ce qu’est la notion de terroir et dans le manque de réflexion qui lui est accordée en Amérique du Nord comme outil potentiel de développement économique et culturel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuizine The Journal of Canadian Food CulturesSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207