MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992093957 · doi:10.2113/jeeg11.1.43

UXO Time-Constant Estimation from Helicopter-Borne TEM Data

2006· article· en· W1992093957 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsGeneral Motors (Canada)
FundersUnited States Atomic Energy Commission
KeywordsUnexploded ordnanceRemote sensingRocket (weapon)Sensitivity (control systems)Transient (computer programming)Range (aeronautics)Sampling (signal processing)GeologyComputer scienceOpticsAerospace engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have developed a new helicopter-borne transient electromagnetic system, known as ORAGS-TEM, which was designed for the detection of unexploded ordnance (UXO) through very low altitude measurements. This system has already achieved considerable success in demonstrations over prepared test grids and a bombing site at the former Badlands Bombing Range (BBR) in South Dakota. UXO ranging in size from 113 kg (250 lb) bombs to 60 mm illumination shells and 7 cm (2.75 in) rocket components were detected by both magnetometer and transient electromagnetic technologies during these trials, conducted in September, 2002. The signal/noise ratio (SNR) observed in TEM measurements during these trials was high, prompting us to ask, “What degree of UXO discrimination can be achieved through detailed analysis of this airborne TEM dataset?” Given the degree of spatial averaging and sampling limitations imposed by the system's flight height and speed, we felt that a very detailed analysis of the type performed by Pasion and Oldenburg would not be practical. Instead, we developed an improved transient analysis technique based on the Matrix Pencil Method to improve the accuracy of exponential decomposition of the observed transients. Where target SNR values of 10 or higher were present this method yielded repeatable results that reliably distinguished compact, long-time-constant targets such as bombs and artillery shells from short-time-constant targets such as thin-walled scrap from practice bombs. As system sensitivity and resolution continues to improve, we expect that similar target discrimination methods will become standard data analysis tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it