An Evaluation of Technologies Used For Hazardous Product Transfer With Regard to Safety, Environmental Compliancy, And Economic Efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A major issue presently facing the oil and gas industry in Alberta is the ever more stringent standards and regulations being implemented with regard to safety and environmental compliance on the worksite. This has led to the development of new technologies in order to maximize production while meeting the regulatory measures instituted to increase safety and reduce environmental hazards while transferring product. The problem lies with the use of products using old technologies invented prior to the institution of many of the current regulations. The combination of old technologies coupled with higher pressures and temperatures is leading to product failure resulting in injuries, fires, and environmentally hazardous situations. Alberta is also dealing with the spectre of a severe skilled labour shortage that must deal with safely operating ever high pressure and temperature process equipment. The solution to these problems comes in the form of new technologies with features targeted at preventing spillage, fires, and uncontrolled releases, designed and built directly into the connecting pieces. It was found that products using the new technology led to less spillage, were more fire safe, and prevented unsafe air release. These test results show transfer products utilizing new technology, which adheres to all current standards and regulations, create a safer, more environmentally sensitive and economically efficient situation. Introduction Stemming from the occurrence of similarly related types of incidents, the need for new technology in the product transfer segment of the oil and gas industry became crucial. Advancements in regulations, and the growing moral responsibility of companies to create a safe, environmentally friendly work atmosphere, have sped up the introduction of these new technologies. The industry trends are shifting towards products that are easier to operate as well as less apt to fail under pressure, while still meeting and exceeding safety and environmental regulations. The new, more technologically advanced products will be outlined and compared to the older technologies in various areas; namely, environmental, safety, and economic efficiency. The popular products currently in use that will be examined include the Double Block &Bleed system, Bull Plugs, Cam Locks, and Flanges. These will be compared in the areas of concern to new technologies developed in order to replace those aforementioned products. The problems presented by these older technologies will be outlined, then followed by an illustration of the changes made in the newer technologies in order to eliminate the problems. The new products will then be analyzed showing how the solution to the previous problem is reached and the economic implications. Graphical comparisons will be made showing the differences between the older products and the newly developed ones, examining the two head-to-head in the three focal areas. Recommendations will be made taking all the information gathered into account. The results will show whether the newer technology is, in fact, superior to the current product being used. Please note that with the continuation of current industry trends, the legislation in place will advance on a regular basis in the areas of safety and environmental allowances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".