MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992149060 · doi:10.1021/cm050523b

First Principles Investigation of Mineral Component of Bone:  CO<sub>3</sub> Substitutions in Hydroxyapatite

2005· article· en· W1992149060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDensity functional theoryCarbonateVacancy defectChemistryAtom (system on chip)Lattice (music)Materials scienceChemical physicsComputational chemistryInorganic chemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First principles calculations are used to investigate carbonated hydroxyapatite, a naturally occurring mineral and also the inorganic component of animal bone. Two types of carbonate substitution are studied: A-type in which the carbonate ion substitutes for an OH and B-type where the substitution is for a phosphate. Both types have unbalanced charges and various forms of charge compensation are treated. The methods, which are based on density functional theory and first principles pseudopotentials, yield equilibrium atomic arrangements, changes in lattice parameters, and total energies for different types of substitution. When calculated energies of selected stable compounds are used, the formation energies of different carbonate substitutions with accompanying charge compensation defects can be compared. The results indicate that compact complexes are energetically favored, and a B-type material with charge compensation by a calcium vacancy together with a hydrogen atom which bonds to a neighboring phosphate is the most stable of all those considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it