MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992155036 · doi:10.1159/000138493

Pressor Response to β <sub>1</sub> - and β <sub>2</sub> -Blockers in Conscious Rats Treated with Phentolamine

2008· article· en· W1992155036 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Tabrizchi, Kathryn A. King, Catherine C.Y. Pang

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsPhentolamineAtenololPropranololEndocrinologyInternal medicineBETA (programming language)AntagonistBolus (digestion)ChemistryBlockadeMedicineBlood pressureReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine the conditions whereby β-blockers cause a pressor response in conscious, unrestrained rats: (1) whether β-blockers cause a pressor response in rats subjected to, or not subjected to, nonselective α-blockade with phentolamine; (2) whether the pressor response to β-blockers is due to the blockade of vasodilator β2-adrenoceptors, and (3) whether it is due to an acute increase in the release of adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA). In the first series of experiments cumulative dose-response curves for propranolol, atenolol and ICI 118,551, nonselective β-, β1 and β2-selective antagonists, respectively, were constructed in rats subjected to a continuous intravenous infusion of phentolamine. The administration of each of the β-antagonists caused a significant dose-dependent increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP). The ED5o values for the increase in MAP were found to be 3.6 ± 0.8, 10 ± 2.6 and 4.6 ± 0.8 μg/kg for propranolol, atenolol and ICI 118,551, respectively. In the second series of experiments, a single bolus injection of a selective or nonselective β-antagonist or saline vehicle was given to rats subjected to a continuous intravenous infusion of phentolamine. Plasma levels of A and NA were determined in the control condition, during the infusion of phentolamine and again after the injection of a β-antagonist. The infusion of phentolamine significantly decreased MAP and increased plasma levels of A and NA. During the infusion of phentolamine, a single bolus injection of propranolol (100 μg/kg), atenolol (100 μg/kg) and ICI 118,551 (30 μg/kg) significantly increased MAP, but did not alter NA and A levels relative to the injection of saline. It is concluded that (1) the pressor response to β-blockers occurs only in rats subjected to α-blockade, (2) pressor response also occurs with a selective β1-antagonist, atenolol, used at doses that do not alter the response of a selective β2-agonist and therefore it is not due to the blockade of vasodilator β2-adrenoceptors, and (3) it is not due to an acute increase in the release of catecholamines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207