Seismic monitoring of a CO<sub>2</sub>flood at Weyburn field, Saskatchewan, Canada: demonstrating the robustness of time‐lapse seismology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002Seismic monitoring of a CO 2 flood at Weyburn field, Saskatchewan, Canada: demonstrating the robustness of time‐lapse seismologyAuthors: Martin J. TerrellThomas L. DavisLeo BrownRodrigo FuckMartin J. TerrellReservoir Characterization Project, Colorado School of Mines, Thomas L. DavisReservoir Characterization Project, Colorado School of Mines, Leo BrownReservoir Characterization Project, Colorado School of Mines, and Rodrigo FuckReservoir Characterization Project, Colorado School of Mineshttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816998 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816998FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited BySeismic anisotropy in exploration and reservoir characterization: An overviewIlya Tsvankin, James Gaiser, Vladimir Grechka, Mirko van der Baan, and Leon Thomsen14 September 2010 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 75, No. 55. Chapter 5: Production GeophysicsMichael A. Payne, William L. Abriel, Michael Wilt, Wences P. Gouveia, David H. Johnston, Arne Solberg, Morten Lauritzen, H. J. Kloosterman, R. S. Kelly, J. Stammeijer, M. Hartung, J. van Waarde, C. Chajecki, Angel Gonzalez-Carballo, Pierre-Yves Guyonnet, Benoit Levallois, Antoine Veillerette, Renaud Deboiasne, William L. Soroka, Peter Melville, Erik Kleiss, Mahfoud Al-Jenaibi, Hafez H. Hafez, Abu Baker Al-Jeelani, Abi Modavi, Jorge S. Gomes, James Rickett, Luca Duranti, Thomas Hudson, Bernard Regel, Neil Hodgson, Jonathan Stewart, Andrew Shatilo, Charlie Jing, Tommie Rape, Richard Duren, Kyle Lewallen, Gary Szurek, Mark Thompson, Børge Arntsen, Lasse Amundsen, Teresa Szydlik, Patrick Smith, Simon Way, Lars Aamodt, Christina Friedrich, Brian E. Hornby, Jianhua Yu, John A. Sharp, Tom Burch, Amal Ray, Mark Roberts, Yan Quist, Sverre Brandsberg-Dahl, A. Al-Anboori, J. -M. Kendall, G. Michael Hoversten, Paul Milligan, Joongmoo Byun, John Washbourne, Larry C. Knauer, Paul Harness, J. F. Ferguson, T. Chen, J. Brady, C. L. V. Aiken, J. Seibert, J. L. Brady, J. L. Hare, J. F. Ferguson, J. E. Seibert, F. J. Klopping, T. Chen, and T. Niebauer21 March 20122. AnisotropyIlya Tsvankin, James Gaiser, Vladimir Grechka, Mirko van der Baan, and Leon Thomsen21 March 2012Toward practical application of the vulnerability evaluation framework for geological sequestration of carbon dioxideEnergy Procedia, Vol. 1, No. 1Thief zone identification through seismic monitoring of a CO2 flood, weyburn field, SaskatchewanAlexandre W. Araman, Matthew Hoffman, and Thomas L. Davis15 December 2008Thief zone identification through seismic monitoring of a CO2 flood, Weyburn Field, SaskatchewanAlexandre W. Araman, Matthew Hoffman, and Thomas L. Davis15 December 20084‐D high‐resolution seismic reflection monitoring of miscible CO2 injected into a carbonate reservoir in the Hall‐Gurney Field, Russell County, KansasRichard D. Miller, Abdelmoneam Elsayed Raef, Alan P. Byrnes, Jamie L. Lambrecht, and William E. Harrison3 January 2005 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2002 Pages: 2478 publication data© 2002 Copyright © 2002 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Martin J. Terrell, Thomas L. Davis, Leo Brown, and Rodrigo Fuck, (2002), "Seismic monitoring of a CO 2 flood at Weyburn field, Saskatchewan, Canada: demonstrating the robustness of time‐lapse seismology," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1673-1676. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816998 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".