MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992182870 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0129

Making the Voyageur World: Travelers and Traders in the North American Fur Trade (review)

2008· article· en· W1992182870 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Thomas Wien

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFur tradeReading (process)LiminalityHistorySociologyArtArt historyPolitical scienceAnthropologyLawEconomic history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Making the Voyageur World: Travelers and Traders in the North American Fur Trade Thomas Wien Making the Voyageur World: Travelers and Traders in the North American Fur Trade. Carolyn Podruchny. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 2006. Pp. 416 The plot of Making the Voyageur World unfolds like a journey, following its supremely mobile protagonists from Lower Canada to the farthest reaches of the ‘upper country’ and from the beginning to the end of their careers. The sights along the way are varied indeed. The introductory chapter offers a quantitative portrait of the occupational group over the period of study (1760–1820), discusses characteristic voyageur values, and proposes subversive ways of reading the fur-trade clerks’ and partners’ writings that are the book’s main source. It is here, too, that Carolyn Podruchny presents the notion of liminality, which frames her analysis throughout. Beginning her special kind of traveller’s account at the point of embarkation, she first explores the Lower Canadian setting and the hiring process. Consideration of the voyageurs’ ethic of non-accumulation rounds out this mostly economic chapter. Chapter 3, [End Page 586] much of which first saw print as a prize-winning article in this journal, deals with the ritual aspects – most memorably, mock baptisms – of the voyageurs’ journeys. Podruchny eloquently argues that these rites of passage, as well as the men’s appropriation of landscape and their workplace terminology, show that ‘the journey itself was a social space for the teaching of new values’ (53). Next comes a study of the labour along the canoe routes. Podruchny skilfully weaves material drawn from folksongs into the analysis of the proverbially difficult working conditions. Introduced by a stimulating analysis of maypoles, chapter 5 (‘The Theater of Hegemony’) examines forms of voyageur resistance to masters’ control of their lives. The next chapter is devoted to voyageur sociability – play, camaraderie, rivalry, and the possibility of homoerotic relations. In chapter 7, we arrive at the interior posts, the scene of varied work routines and more intense interaction with Aboriginal groups, notably in trade. That interaction is viewed from a gender perspective in the next chapter, analyzing relations between voyageurs and Aboriginal women. Podruchny depicts a highly sexualized fur trade, stressing reciprocity between the partners and the transitory nature of many relationships. The last chapter briefly surveys the fate of ex-voyageurs, especially those who remained in the interior as freemen. Celebrating fluidity, syncretism, and métissage, Making the Voyageur World is about cultural interaction. Like other ethnohistorians studying the colonial period, Podruchny sets her story in a ‘time of possibility’ in intercultural relations (308) and chooses to emphasize ‘cooperation rather than conflict between European Americans and aboriginal peoples’ (306). The choice serves her well. Probing beneath the carefree, flamboyant, indefatigable folk hero’s attributes, Podruchny portrays men who discovered new ways of experiencing the world, first within the canoe brigade, and then on prolonged or permanent sojourns among Native people. Making sensitive use of a rich collection of fur-trade and travellers’ narratives as well as of her cultural historian’s tool kit (Bakhtin, Gramsci, Turner . . .), the author does not entirely reject the stereotype. Rather, she probes its limits by imaginatively reconstructing the voyageurs’ experience of an inter-cultural space. To her credit, Podruchny is by no means blind to the tensions and the ambiguities accompanying the voyageurs’ explorations. Among the signs of dissonance she notes voyageurs boasting that they were more skilful than Aboriginal people, giving their version of a cliché of European colonialism (11); significant numbers of voyageurs whose contact with Native people was very limited (62); voyageurs expressing [End Page 587] fear that the latter would profane their burial sites (84); the incidence of violence in their relations with the Aboriginal population, including women (230, 252, 283); evidence of the limits of these women’s agency in contact with voyageurs (265) and even of their presence at the posts (275). In a sense, the theme of cultural interaction is built into the very structure of this westward-looking book, with its extended parallel between journey and career. The author’s preferred travelling companions, so to speak, are the men whose intercultural voyage took them (and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207