MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992202315 · doi:10.4000/ries.253

Le portfolio ou portefeuille de compétences

2006· article· fr· W1992202315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bernadette Plumelle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePortfolioEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le portfolio est à l’origine un recueil de travaux effectués dans des métiers artistiques tels que celui de photographe ou d’architecte. Ces derniers choisissent dans l’ensemble de leurs œuvres celles qui les représentent le mieux et qui marquent leur évolution artistique. Le portfolio en éducation reprend ces deux notions de représentativité et de progression pour en faire un instrument d’apprentissage et d’évaluation. Cet outil est largement répandu aux États-Unis et au Canada à tous les ni...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207