Impact studies on Nordic forests: effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and fertilization on gas exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, [CO 2 ], and fertilization on gas exchange of four field-grown tree species were examined using the branch bag technique (Picea abies (L.) Karst., Pinus sylvestris L., Fagus sylvatica L.) or whole tree chambers (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray). Results are presented on changes in light-saturated rates of net photosynthesis (A sat ), carboxylation efficiency (α), stomatal conductance (g s ), and stomatal limitation of photosynthesis (L s ) after 24 years of CO 2 exposure. Fertilization alone did not significantly change A sat , α, g s , or L s for any of the species, but α and A sat were linearly related to foliage nitrogen content when compared across all treatments. No significant CO 2 effects were detected for α, g s , or A sat when compared at the same intercellular [CO 2 ], i.e., no downregulation of A sat was apparent. "Long-term" CO 2 enrichment increased A sat significantly by 49, 53, 86, and 114% in Populus trichocarpa, Picea abies, F. sylvatica, and Pinus sylvestris, respectively. In all the species the relative CO 2 effect on A sat increased linearly with temperature. Thus, application of a simple linear relationship could improve predictions of future tree growth responses to increasing CO 2 and temperature in cool climates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".