MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992210270 · doi:10.1080/15326340008807592

Inventory management at service facilities for systems with arbitrarily distributed service times

2000· article· en· W1992210270 on OpenAlexaff
O. Berman, K.P. Sapna

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Statistics Stochastic Models · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)QueuePoisson distributionComputer scienceMarkov chainMathematical optimizationOperations researchService levelInventory controlInventory managementService systemValue (mathematics)Operations managementMathematicsBusinessStatisticsComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes an inventory system for service facilities where there is limited waiting space for customers. For service facilities, typically inventory is used during the provision of service. We consider a system with Poisson arrivals, arbitrarily distributed service times and zero leadtimes. Optimal value of the maximum allowable inventory that minimizes the long-run expected cost rate is obtained in an elegant manner. Various examples of service distributions and optimal values for maximum inventory in each of these cases is also presented. Our analysis also yields a closed form expression of the stationary distribution for the embedded Markov chain of an M/G/l finite capacity queue

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Statistics Stochastic ModelsSame topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207