MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992222990 · doi:10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60781-8

Working to Promote and Maintain a Safe and Secure Environment in a Hospital Setting

2000· article· en· W1992222990 on OpenAlexaff
G Langill, Ralph Michael, Mary Lou Ware

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorkplace Violence and Bullying
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAFERTask (project management)Working environmentPatient safetyMedical emergencyComputer securityNursingBusinessProcess managementMedicineComputer scienceEngineeringPolitical scienceHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines how one hospital developed an approach to creating a safer and more secure environment for staff and patients. A cross-functional task group promoted a review of existing practices and processes related to the issue of violence in the workplace. The task group made recommendations for improving prevention, response, and the reporting of violent incidents. Results to date indicate that this approach is working to meet the goal of a safer and more secure environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicWorkplace Violence and BullyingFrench-language works237,207