MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992232647 · doi:10.1080/01495730500257490

Thermoelastic Damping in Nanomechanical Resonators with Finite Wave Speeds

2006· article· en· W1992232647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Stresses · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoelastic dampingResonatorHingeBeam (structure)Nanoelectromechanical systemsRelaxation (psychology)Materials scienceMechanicsWork (physics)PhysicsClassical mechanicsAcousticsThermalThermodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The operation of micro-=nanobeams vibrating at very high frequencies, such as encountered in micro-=nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS=NEMS), hinges on the minimization of intrinsic material losses. We study the associated thermoelastic damping in such beams from the standpoint of a generalized theory of thermoelasticity with one relaxation time. Some of our results relate to: (i) the cooling (instead of heating) in the compressed surface of the beam; (ii) the existence of not one damping peak appearing in the classical theory, but many peaks, with a decreasing amplitude as the frequency tends to infinity; (iii) the relevance of thermoelasticity with finite wave speeds for frequencies on the order of 1012Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it