Relational poetry in the expression of social identity: Creating interweaving dialogues
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social constructionism holds that meanings are produced in social interactions, which are, in turn, shaped by specific socio-cultural, political, and economic forces. These forces also affect our sense of self, social identities, knowledge, and interpretation of realities. Following the work of Witkin (2007) on relational poetry, this author interweaves a second poem within the lines and verses of Kumsa’s (2007) poem, thereby producing a poetic dialogue and a new poem. This article highlights the inter-subjectivities of the human experience and the co-construction of meaning arising from multiple experiences, realities and truths. It presents relational poetry as another entrée into our co-constructed realities. It is an experiment with a mode of writing and engagement about inter-subjectivities. In using this literary style, this article also fulfills the ethical responsibility within social work of bringing awareness to voices and perspectives that have been marginalized and oppressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it