MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Duodenal and biliary atresia associated with facial, thyroid and auditory apparatus abnormalities: a new mandibulofacial dysostosis syndrome?

2006· review· en· W1992274882 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Maegawa, David Chitayat, Susan Blasér, Hilary Whyte, Micki Thomas, Peter Kim, Jae Kim, Glen A. Taylor, Patrick J. McNamara

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Dysmorphology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtresiaDuodenal atresiaChoanal atresiaBiliary atresiaMicrotiaAnatomyInternal medicineLiver transplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a female child born at 36 weeks of gestation with multiple abnormalities including dysmorphic and coarse facial features with features of mandibulofacial dysostosis that include bilateral microtia with the absence of external auditory meati and Mondini dysplasia as well as, duodenal atresia, intestinal malrotation, anterior displacement of the anus, left hemiaplasia of the thyroid and biliary atresia in sibs. The associations of duodenal atresia with intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary atresia in sibs have been reported, suggesting an autosomal recessive syndrome. However, the associated external, middle and internal ear anomalies and the thyroid malformation, however, have not been reported in this condition. To the best of our knowledge, this is a hitherto new syndrome with an unknown inheritance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical DysmorphologySame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207