National Survey of Hemapheresis Practice in Hungary 2001–2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the current study, the authors evaluated data provided by Hungarian hemapheresis centers to the National Health Insurance (NHI) organization between 2001 and 2004 with the intention of having costs reimbursed. The primary objective of the present study was to rank data by frequency of indications of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Furthermore, we compared frequency data with the Canadian TPE Registry and reviewed medical evidence regarding the adequacy of applying TPE at chosen indications based on data in literature. It was concluded that the number of TPEs (and thus the reimbursed costs) increased steadily year by year. It is worth considering the difference between the five most frequent indications of TPE in Hungary or in Canada. Clinicians tend to apply TPE in many cases as a last resort treatment of many diseases unresponsive to conventional therapy. Consequently, there are many illnesses for which the value of TPE is still questionable (or unproven) and its use is considered investigational or experimental. Nevertheless, cumulative medical experience does not always confirm the adequacy of TPE in all treatments, retrospectively. Thus, limited financial resources oblige clinicians to be judicious in providing apheresis services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".