MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992317385 · doi:10.1145/860575.860726

Coalition formation with non-transferable payoff for group buying

2003· article· en· W1992317385 on OpenAlexaff
Frederick Asselin, Brahim Chaib-draa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAuction Theory and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartition (number theory)Stochastic gameTransferable utilityPareto optimalPareto principleGroup (periodic table)Group buyingDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical economicsSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationSoftwarePareto efficiencyCore (optical fiber)Game theoryMathematicsMulti-objective optimizationCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Group buying is a natural application domain for research on coalition formation. Finding a Pareto-optimal partition (no other partition gives more to a consumer without giving less to another one) of the set of consumers in buying groups is equivalent to the generation of exact set covers known to be NP-hard [1]. Since humans have difficulties in finding Pareto-optimal deals in reasonably complex situations, the use of software agents is justified. In this short paper, an investigation on the computational and economic performances of software agents in non-transferable payoff coalition formation (the general and less studied case) applied to group buying is conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAuction Theory and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207