Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude, liée à la commande de vitraux par le musée des Beaux-Arts de Saint-Lô (50) à Sergio de Castro en 2008, a pour ambition de se pencher sur la démarche de cet artiste dans le domaine du vitrail. En 1956-1959, ce peintre, de renommée internationale, réalise ses premiers vitraux (exécutés par J.J.K. Ray) pour le couvent de Couvrechef près de Caen. En 1968-1969, il crée ceux du temple de la Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Kirche à Hambourg (Allemagne), en 1978-1981, ceux de la collégiale de Romont (Suisse) et enfin des vitraux pour des particuliers ou des expositions. Grâce aux archives conservées par l’artiste, nous pourrons évoquer la totalité de ses interventions dans le vitrail et révéler notamment l’importance de projets inaboutis entre 1981 et 1989, pour des édifices tels que les cathédrales de Strasbourg (67) et de Nevers (58), la collégiale d’Écouis (27), l’église de Bormes-les-Mimosas (83), ou la bibliothèque de Limoges (87).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".