MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992330613 · doi:10.1109/cts.2013.6567244

Experience feedback guides for crisis management using GIS

2013· preprint· en· W1992330613 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Sediri, Nada Matta, Jason Dai, Sophie Loriette, Alain Hugerot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicTeam Dynamics and Performance
Canadian institutionsDoug Bragg Enterprises (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamagesCrisis managementWork (physics)Presentation (obstetrics)Order (exchange)Emergency managementComputer scienceSubject (documents)Knowledge managementProcess managementBusinessEngineeringManagementPolitical scienceEconomicsWorld Wide WebEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crisis management is a special type of collaborative approach in which the actors are subject to an uninterrupted stress. It is a quite significant issue because the consequences of crises can bring huge damages (human and economic loses). In order to learn from expertise and reduce consequences, we study how to represent emergency management situations based on experience feedback. Several dimensions are considered in this study, from one side: organization, communication and problem solving activities and from the other side the presentation of experience using GIS. We present in this paper our first results. This work is done with the collaboration of the Aube' Emergency Department.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeam Dynamics and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207