MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992334091 · doi:10.5539/apr.v6n4p26

Pressure Dependency Grüneisen Parameter r for bcc Mo

2014· article· en· W1992334091 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuanhui Nie, Baochun Zong, Junping Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture
KeywordsThermodynamicsMaterials scienceYield (engineering)Work (physics)Dependency (UML)MolybdenumMelting pointMelting temperatureEquation of statePhysicsMetallurgyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been reinforced by Kushwah et al. (Kushwah, 2013) that the Lindemann law doesn’t work satisfactorily for the transition metals. We think this point is open to question. Combining the Lindemann law and the Vinet et al thermal equation of state with the melting curves of bcc Mo, we present an explicitly simple expression of the pressure dependency Grüneisen parameter g for Molybdenum. The results yield good agreement with density functional theory and experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207