MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992354358 · doi:10.1117/12.641414

Development of diode-pumped high average power continuous-wave and ultrashort pulse Yb:KGW lasers for nonlinear microscopy

2006· article· en· W1992354358 on OpenAlexafffund
Arkady Major, Richard Cisek, Virginijus Barzda

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolid State Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsLaserOpticsUltrashort pulseMaterials sciencePulse durationContinuous waveMode-lockingOptoelectronicsDiodeInjection seederPulse (music)Second-harmonic generationSemiconductor laser theoryPhysicsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the development of diode-pumped high power continuous-wave (CW) and ultrashort pulse Yb:KGW lasers for applications in nonlinear multimodal microscopy. In the CW regime we generated 5W of average output power from a simple three-mirror cavity, with 22% of optical-to-optical conversion efficiency. The CW laser was used as a platform for development of a high power mode-locked oscillator. We achieved 2.3W of average output power in the mode-locked regime with ~210 fs duration pulses centered around 1047 nm at a repetition rate of 97 MHz. This corresponds to 24 nJ of energy per pulse and 114 kW of peak power. The demonstrated laser will be used in second- and third-harmonic generation microscopy of biological samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSolid State Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207