MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992360702 · doi:10.3138/jvme.30.1.5

Culture Change and Veterinary Medicine

2003· letter· en· W1992360702 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rob Werge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Medical Education · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisciplineWork (physics)Veterinary medicineVeterinary educationParadigm shiftPublic healthOne HealthAnimal healthEngineering ethicsMedicineMedical educationPublic relationsPolitical scienceSociologyCurriculumSocial sciencePedagogyNursingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent article by Thurmond and Brown called for “a major cultural shift” in veterinary education.1 Such a proposed shift would more effectively prepare veterinary graduates to assume roles in emerging fields related to animal health, such as food safety, biotechnology, public health, environmental health, and others. In such fields, veterinarians must be prepared to work across sometimes deep cultural, as well as economic and disciplinary, boundaries.2 Some of those boundaries have been built by veterinarians themselves. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss some of the ways in which the profession can identify and move beyond its own cultural borders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.596
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.025 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Veterinary Medical EducationSame topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207