MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992383745 · doi:10.1093/biomet/ast009

High-dimensional semiparametric bigraphical models

2013· article· en· W1992383745 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiometrika · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsSemiparametric modelGaussianCategorical variableParametric statisticsSemiparametric regressionMissing dataNonparametric statisticsRegularization (linguistics)Applied mathematicsGaussian processMultivariate normal distributionParametric modelMultivariate statisticsStatisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In multivariate analysis, a Gaussian bigraphical model is commonly used for modelling matrix-valued data. In this paper, we propose a semiparametric extension of the Gaussian bigraphical model, called the nonparanormal bigraphical model. A projected nonparametric rank-based regularization approach is employed to estimate sparse precision matrices and produce graphs under a penalized likelihood framework. Theoretically, our semiparametric procedure achieves the parametric rates of convergence for both matrix estimation and graph recovery. Empirically, our approach outperforms the parametric Gaussian model for non-Gaussian data and is competitive with its parametric counterpart for Gaussian data. Extensions to the categorical bigraphical model and the missing data problem are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it